Customer Care Support:

  +2347065335797   17 Osinowo Street, Ikosi Ketu, Lagos

Judge Rejects J& J’s Attempt to Settle Talc Lawsuits in Bankruptcy, Imperiling $8.9 Billion Settlement

Judge Rejects J& J's Attempt to Settle Talc Lawsuits

Johnson & Johnson (J&J) faced a significant setback as a U.S. Bankruptcy Judge in Trenton, New Jersey, dismissed their second attempt to resolve tens of thousands of lawsuits over their talc products through bankruptcy. This ruling puts the proposed $8.9 billion settlement at risk, which aimed to halt new lawsuits from being filed against the company. The judge’s decision came as a blow to J&J’s efforts to address the allegations surrounding its talc products, and the legal battle between the company and cancer victims continues to escalate.

The Complex Bankruptcy Saga

J&J’s first attempt to address the talc lawsuits began in 2021 when they transferred their talc liabilities to a new company called LTL Management and placed it into bankruptcy. However, this move faced opposition, and LTL’s first bankruptcy was dismissed in April after a U.S. appeals court ruled that the company was not in immediate financial distress to warrant bankruptcy protection.

LTL then filed for bankruptcy a second time, arguing that this effort had garnered more support from plaintiffs for a comprehensive settlement of current and future lawsuits linking J&J’s talc products to cancer. However, the U.S. Justice Department’s bankruptcy watchdog and attorneys representing cancer victims criticized this move, viewing it as an abuse of the bankruptcy law to avoid jury trials.

J&J’s Defense and Plaintiff’s Perspective

J&J, a company with a significant financial standing, argued that the proposed bankruptcy settlement offered a fairer and quicker resolution for cancer claimants than pursuing litigation in other courts. The company pointed out the rising costs related to talc-related verdicts, settlements, and legal fees, reaching approximately $4.5 billion.

On the other hand, plaintiffs’ lawyers who opposed the $8.9 billion offer alleged that J&J had artificially created support for the settlement by signing deals with plaintiffs’ lawyers who quickly enlisted numerous clients without filing lawsuits against J&J. They expressed concerns that settling the lawsuits in bankruptcy would allow J&J to enforce the terms on cancer victims opposing the deal and prevent future lawsuits from those who develop cancer due to talc use.

The Impact on Legal Proceedings and Litigation

The ongoing bankruptcy proceedings have put a pause on the 38,000 talc-related lawsuits filed before October 2021. However, Judge Kaplan allowed one case to proceed to trial during LTL’s second bankruptcy, resulting in an $18.8 million verdict in favor of a California man who claimed to have developed cancer from exposure to J&J’s baby powder.

The legal battle between Johnson & Johnson and cancer victims over talc-related lawsuits continues to be a complex and contentious issue. The recent dismissal of the company’s second attempt to settle the cases in bankruptcy has raised questions about the future of the proposed $8.9 billion settlement and the potential implications on the ongoing litigation. As the dispute unfolds, it remains crucial for all stakeholders to ensure a fair and transparent resolution that addresses the concerns of cancer victims and the need for accountability in the pharmaceutical industry.

Please follow and like us:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Healthcoach’s aim is to see an Africa where every person has access to reliable health information and advice to live a healthy and happy life

Need Help?

Call or text +2347065335797

Email us

2 Shiffau Crescent, Off Osinowo Street, Ikosi-Ketu, Lagos, Nigeria.


Follow Us

© 2023 HubCare Global Ltd. All rights reserved. Our website services, content, and products are for informational purposes only. Healthcoach does not provide medical advice, diagnosis and treatment.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Complain Policy

Translate »